UA EN

Bondaruk T.².

The scientific-practical Law Journal
“Almanac of Law” Volume 13 (2022), 194-198 p.

DOI: 10.33663/2524-017X-2022-13-31

Bondaruk T. ². Pré-souveraineté: Ukrainian content

The article attempts to single out key ideas that preceded the modern vision of sovereignty and to analyze their development in the context of state-legal development on Ukrainian lands. In particular, attention is drawn to such of them as the idea of “own production”, independence and self-sufficiency (J. Boden), the idea of social solidarity and the rule of law (L. Dyugy), the idea of a sovereign people in the state (St. Dnistryanskyi).

In particular, their formalization in the privileges of the Union of Lublin is analyzed, according to which Kyiv, Volyn and Bratslav Voivodeships received: guarantees of inviolability of borders, the right to sue under the II Lithuanian Statute, the right to use the Russian (Old Ukrainian) language as the sole language of court and administration, etc. It is claimed that the existence of these rights ensured the further creation of the Russian identity of the inhabitants of Ukrainian territories already within the Commonwealth of Nations and the creation of the territorial and legal model of the Russian (Ukrainian) people. Attention is drawn to the Union of Brest in 1596 as an attempt to implement the idea of social solidarity, the Treaty of Zborivsk in 1649, which recorded the appearance of the Zaporizhzhya Army as a Cossack state, legalized its self-government and, in a certain way, legitimized it on the international arena and the Hadiac Agreement of 1658.

It is concluded that it is they who determine the modus operandi of sovereignty or pré-souveraineté and that there is an invariably high index of the “sovereignty instinct” of the Ukrainian society, which confirms its implementation of the main ideas on which the modern idea of sovereignty is based.

Key words: sovereignty, ideas of sovereignty, Ukrainian statehood, state-legal process.

References

1. Derzhavnyi suverenitet Ukrainy. Kn. I: Vytoky: monohrafiia. L. V. Voitovych, V. A. Hrynchak, H. M. Fedushchak-Paslavska. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2020. 268 s.

2. Ziabliuk M. P. Suverenitet. Yurydychna entsyklopediia: V 6 t. / Redkol.: Yu. S. Shemshuchenko (vidp. red.) ta in. Kyiv: Ukr. entsykl., 2003. T. 5: P–S. 736 s.

3. Mere Zh. Pryntsyp suverenitetu. Istoriia ta osnovy novitnoi vlady. Perekl. z frantsuzkoi L. Kononovycha. Lviv: Kalvariia, 2003. 216. S. 22–23.

4. Karmazina M. S. Suverenitet: evoliutsiia tlumachennia poniattia ta rozvytku yavyshcha. Naukovi zapysky. Instytut politychnykh i etnonatsionalnykh doslidzhen im. I. F. Kurasa NAN Ukrainy. 2013. ¹ 3 (65). S. 164– 189.

5. Romanovskaia V. B., Puzhaev V. V. Problema hosudarstvennoho suverenyteta y ee otrazhenye v tvorchestve Leona Diuhy y Raimona Karre de Malberha. Zhurnal rossyiskoho prava. 2016. ¹ 2. S. 26–38.

6. Sarakutsa M. O. Poniattia ta zmist derzhavnoho suverenitetu: vyznachennia, stanovlennia, rozvytok. Forum prava. 2010. ¹ 4. S. 784–791.

7. Dnistrianskyi S. S. Nova derzhava. Antolohiia ukrainskoi yurydychnoi dumky. Za zah. red. Yu. S. Shemshuchenko; uporiad.: V. F. Pohorilko, O. V. Batanov, V. L. Fedorenko. Kyiv: Vyd. Dim «Iuryd. kn.» T. 4: Konstytutsiine (derzhavne) pravo. 2003. S. 577–590.

8. Shapoval T. Narodnyi suverenitet ta politychni prava i svobody (pytannia spivvidnoshennia). Pravo Ukrainy: yurydychnyi zhurnal. 2008. ¹ 2. S. 9–13.

9. Starchenko N. Liublinska uniia yak resurs formuvannia kontseptu politychnoho «narodu ruskoho» (1569– 1648 rr.). Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal. 2019. ¹ 2. S. 3–12. URL: http://resource.history.org.ua/publ/ UIJ_2019_2_3

10. Shevchenko V. Pochatok beresteiskoho uniinoho protsesu v svitli suchasnykh bohoslovskykh refleksii shchodo uniatyzmu. Ukrainske relihiieznavstvo. 2017. ¹ 81–82. Beresteiskyi sobor 1596 roku v istorychnii doli ukrainstva. S. 81–92.

11. Paslavskyi I. Beresteiska uniia v konteksti pershoho ukrainskoho natsionalno-kulturnoho vidrodzhennnia. Ukrainske relihiieznavstvo. 2017. ¹ 81–82. S. 178–188.

12. Hazin V. «Na zrazok kniazivstva Lytovskoho»: perspektyvy vkliuchennia kozatskoi Ukrainy do skladu Rechi Pospolytoi u 1658–1659 rr. (ochikuvannia ta realii). Ukraina Lithuanica: studii z istorii Velykoho kniazivstva Lytovskoho. 2021. Vyp. 6. C. 84–100.

13. Chukhlib T. Sekrety ukrainskoho polivasalitetu. Khmelnytskyi – Doroshenko – Mazepa. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim «Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia», 2011. 327 s.

14. Jackson R. Sovereignty in World Politics: a Glance at the Conceptual and Historical Landscape. Political Studies. 1999. ¹ 47. Ð. 431–456. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00211.

<< Back

  G Analytics
ðàçðàáîòêà ñàéòà âåá ñòóäèÿ