UA EN

Muzyka I. V.

The scientific-practical Law Journal
“Almanac of Law” Volume 13 (2022), 269-275 p.

DOI: 10.33663/2524-017X-2022-13-44

Muzyka I. V. Manipulative technologies of racist ideologues in the system of formation of defective legal consciousness

In the proposed article, the author attempts to prove that in the system of formation of defective legal consciousness of modern societies, the leading role is played by manipulative technologies. The connections between manipulative technologies and the distorted legal consciousness inherent in all carriers in Russia are highlighted. It is revealed that ideological factors, in particular, legal demagoguery – manipulation of the idea of law and legal values - are the basis of the destructive social order established in Russia with ingrained defective public legal consciousness. It is established that the defect of political and legal consciousness was the result of manipulations with the help of the following basic narratives: the concept of the «Russian world» as a world empire; revanchist expansionism and the cult of war. It is believed that this problem today requires a detailed study in order to create tools to counter Russian aggression in the information space and prevent the manifestations of such phenomena in the legal life of Ukraine.

Key words: imperial ideology of racism, manipulative technologies, scientific manipulations, defective legal consciousness, «Russian world».

References

1. Suhestyvni tekhnolohiyi manipulyatyvnoho vplyvu: navch. posib. / V. M. Petryk, M. M. Prysyazhnyuk, L. F. Kompantseva, YE. D. Skulysh, O. D. Boyko, V. V. Ostroukhov; za zah. red. YE. D. Skulysha. 2-he vyd. Kyiv: ZAT “VIPOL”, 2011. S. 9, 11.

2. Tomsinov V. A. «Krymskoye pravo», ili Yuridicheskiye osnovaniya vossoyedineniya Kryma s Rossiyey. Moskva: IKD Zertsalo-M, 2015.132 s.

3. Robert W. McGee, Secession Reconsidered. Journal of libertarian studies 11:l (OSINʹ 19941: 11-33. a1994 Center for libertarian studie. URL: https://cdn.mises.org/11_1_2_0.pdf

4. Yefymenko Hennadiy. Zabute svyato. 6 lypnya 1923 roku – denʹ narodzhennya SRSR. URL: https://www. istpravda.com.ua/articles/2012/07/20/90121/

5. Kresina I. O., Yavir V. A. Narod. Entsyklopediya suchasnoyi Ukrayiny. URL: https://esu.com.ua/search_ articles.php?id=71245

6. Fedorov A. V. Pravovoy status Kryma. Pravovoy status Sevastopolya. Moskva: Izd-vo MGU, 1999. S. 46–48.

7. Yavir V. A. Etnopolitychna intehratsiya ta dezintehratsiya u suchasnomu sviti: polity- ko-pravovyy kontsept: monohrafiya. Kyyiv: Lohos, 2018. 468 s.

8. Grinin L. Ye. Istoricheskiye i geopoliticheskiye prichiny sotsial’no-politicheskogo krizisna na Ukraine. Istoriya i sovremennost’. 2015. ¹ 2. S. 3–44.

9. Zvorykin B. D. Etatistskaya model’ sotsial’noy modernizatsii: vliyaniye politicheskikh rezhimov i sovremennyy opyt realizatsii. Vlast’. 2009. ¹ 3. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/etatistskaya-model-sotsialnoy- modernizatsii-vliyanie-politicheskih-rezhimov-I sovremennyy-opyt-realizatsii (data obrashcheniya: 23.06.2022).

10. Tishkov V. A. YAzyki natsii. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, 2016, tom 86, ¹ 4, s. 291–303; Tishkov V. A. Rossiyskiy narod: istoriya i smysl natsional’nogo samosoznaniya. Ins-t etnologii i antropologii im. N. N. Miklukho-Maklaya RAN. Moskva: Nauka, 2013. 649 s.

11. Shishkov V. V. Imperskaya paradigma: ispytaniye modernizatsiyey i natsionalizmom. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Politologiya. 2013. ¹1. S. 92–101.

12. Div.: Etnicheskiy i religioznyy faktory v formirovanii i evolyutsii rossiyskogo gosudarstva. Institut rossiyskoy istorii RAN. Seriya «1150 let rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti» / otv. red. T. YU. Krasovitskaya, V. A. Tishchkov. Moskva: Novyy khronograf, 212. 448 s.; Malinova O. YU. Konstruirovaniye smyslov: Issledovaniye simvolicheskoy politiki v sovremennoy Rossii: Monografiya / RAN. INION. Tsentr sotsial’nykh nauch.- inform. issled. Otd. polit. nauki. M., 2013. 421 s.; Tabakov Igor’. Oskolki razbitogo vdrebezgi: istoricheskoye porazheniye imperskogo proyekta. Ab Imperio. 2001. ¹ 4. S. 391–435.

13. Konstruktivnyye i destruktivnyye formy mifologizatsii sotsial’noy pamyati v proshlom i nastoyashchem: sbornik statey i tezisov dokladov mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. Lipetsk, 24-26 sentyabrya 2015 goda / FGBOU VPO «Rossiyskaya akademiya narodnogo khozyaystva i gosudarstvennoy sluzhby pri Prezidente Rossiyskoy Federatsii», Lipetskiy filial; Rossiyskoye obshchestvo intellektual’noy istorii; Rossiyskoye filosofskoye obshchestvo. Tambov: Izdatel’stvo Pershina R.V., 2015. 400 s.

14. Äèâ.: Szporluk R., Poe M. T. «Moscow, the Third Rome» The Origins and Transformations of a «Pivotal Moment». Harvard University, The National Council for Soviet and East European Research, 1997. Available at: https://www.ucis.pitt.edu/ nceeer/1997-811-25-Poe.pd

15. Demin V. N. Giperboreya: istoricheskiye korni rus’kogo naroda. Moskva: FAIR-PRESS, 2001. 624 s.; V. A. Shemchuk. Rus’ boreyskaya. Ukradennaya istoriya. Moskva: Vsemirnyy fond planety Zemlya, 2001. 160 s.

16. Domanovsʹkyy Andriy. Vizantiysʹki vydyva rosiysʹkoho impersʹkoho revanshyzmu. Krytyka. Travenʹ 2022. URL: https://krytyka.com/ua/articles/vizantiiski-vydyva-rosiiskoho-imperskoho-revanshyzmu

17. Laryuel’ Marlen. Ariyskiy mif – russkiy viglyad / 25 marta 2010. URL: https://www.vokrugsveta.ru/telegraph/ theory/1125/

<< Back

  G Analytics
ðàçðàáîòêà ñàéòà âåá ñòóäèÿ